Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 18:32

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Will you Vote for Andrew Tate for UK PM?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
This Vitamin May Lower Your Stroke Risk by 17%, New Study Says - EatingWell
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Are there any men who have sex with male dogs?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI - TechCrunch
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
What is the STAR interview method?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sixers go center again in 2nd round, draft Johni Broome - NBC Sports Philadelphia
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The dogs of Chernobyl may be evolving right before our eyes - Boy Genius Report
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
"Hairy frogfish" walk on the seafloor and use lures to catch dinner - Earth.com